On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:08:01AM -0800, Ryan Finnie wrote: > Sorry for the double reply Mattia; I forgot to CC BTS originally. > > On 3/1/07, Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The patch you're refrerring is missing some bits to actually work, the > >attached patch is based on b428b51ed9a4ff8445ea50769961f948480c1d36 > >(just one hunk removed since it's already present), applies ontop of > >uml-compilation.patch and fixes the build issue you're seeing. > > > >Can you confirm? > > Confirmed. UML guest compiles with the patch and seems to be running OK. > > Should this be serious instead of important? It should probably go in > the next package release anyway because it's a regression, but I don't > know if that means a severity change.
Don't know, let's wait for someone from the kernel-team to speakup. Anyway also note that MODE_TT is known to be broken and is discouraged from upstream UML developers. -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
