Re: martin f krafft 2006-09-05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Couldn't this be written more simply using bts (which already > > provides most of the functionality you are proposing, which many > > more bells and whistles)? Then there could be a command "bts > > claimbug" which did exactly what you've specified. > > Sure. I just hacked it up quicker this way. > > Also, I like claimbug because we don't know whether claiming bugs > will always remain a BTS action. It wasn't in the past, it may not > be in the future. > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00031.html
Fwiw, I still think this should be implemented in 'bts', without any extra magic addresses. As claiming bugs is about bugs, I doubt it will ever be moved out of the BTS again. Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature