On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Nick Hill wrote:
I expect users who use zile as I do are familiar with nano, pico, mc etc. There are many reasons why I prefer Zile v1 as my primary text editor
I can only apologise, then. That's not the niche I'm aiming to fill. Have you considered using Jed?
I concur Zile v2 has a definite niche to fill, particularly given the increasing bloat of emacs. However, it is a very different niche to v1.
I agree. I just thought that there were alternatives to Zile v1.
Zile V1 caters for those who don't know much about emacs but would like to,
...this is perhaps a niche that nothing else filled.
Perhaps the lisp interpreter planned for v2 may be used to emulate v1 behaviour as a modular architecture, but then again, the v1 audience will have moved on by then.
There's no longer any plan to add a Lisp interpreter to v2.
-- http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | plagiarism, n. the mind burgles
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
