-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 29-03-2005 14:29, Wen-chien Jesse Sung wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> | On 29-03-2005 08:14, Wen-chien Jesse Sung wrote:
> |
> |
> |>>upgrade from 7:2002edebian1-6 and got this:
> |
> |
> | Did you try (and fail) upgrading to -6.1 before that?
> |
> | If so, I believe it is a bug in -6.1 which has been solved since (but
> | without a workaround for those bitten by the bug).
> 
> Yes, I tried to upgrade to -6.1 and failed several days ago, and then I
> downgrade it to -6.

I don't like putting too much effort into solving this bug, then.

Keeping the code relatively sane to avoid bugs hitting users of stable
Debian releases is much more important than handling bugs hitting only
those (possibly many) choosing to live on the edge and running testing
releases. Especially when the workaround is simply to try installing again.


> Humm... Maybe the update-inetd should not be run if
> /var/cache/ipopd_inetd.conf_copy exists.

I may have lost you (my mind is at several places simultanously - quite
annoying actually, but not your fault), but the bug in -6.1 causes
_wrong_ info in the cache file. Can't see how you will sanely handle
that situation (without special code for that single release).

As I understand it, it should always be safe to do update-inetd (or if
not, we can't trust our own knowledge of the world, and then we should
fail rather than go silent about it!).


> How about the attached diff that against -8? I don't know whether the
> test for "version less then -6"
> is needed or not, so it's still there.

I appreciate your efforts, but please if you want to help improve the
code then have a close look at my work-in-progress on -9 (the file
"___PKG__.postinst.in" - also see if you can spot errors in my changed
code!): http://debian.jones.dk/auryn/pool/official/uw-imap/debian-test/

 - Jonas

- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCSVCEn7DbMsAkQLgRAjL0AJsEIGjspnw+Z8349omzc5cakaB0cwCfWHkb
pme5NuGoCFhxDPJ98w5T+fY=
=RPZx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to