reopen 395054 ! tag 395054 +wontfix thanks
Around Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:33:49 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote (caps added): > Since the original issue behind this report has been resolved, and the > secondary issue isn't one I think is a bug (OR AM INTERESTED IN fixing > IF IT IS), I'm closing this bug. Well, "if" there is a bug, then you shouldn't close it based on whether or not it interests you. Fatigue or lack of interest is a poor reason for closing, rather you should close your interest in whatever topic bores you, and maybe do other things you like better. I really appreciate the time and help you've put into it, but worry that those misdirected URLs and hard to follow passages were indicators of overwork. Now for a troubleshooter or bug reporter, accidently or deliberately making mistakes can be a fine thing, because one often runs into new bugs or design flaws that way. But for the guy trying to fix things, one's own mistakes very seldom offer much in the way of extra benefits. By "the original issue" I think you meant bug #394813, the state of which is irrelevant to the validity of this bug. Aside from those points, I intend to let this bug sit a while and suggest you take a vacation from this, and maybe later I'll reread the thread and take a poke at it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
