Thank you for your answer! Am Freitag, den 02.02.2007, 16:12 +0100 schrieb A Mennucc: > But, in these 12 subrevisions, I have accumulated many patches, so I > decided that I will probably switch to using quilt - after etch is > released, since my ignorance of quilt may very well provoke build > problems.
Yes, please use quilt or dpatch (for all patches, not only a few then). > As a preliminary step , I catalogized in debian/patches all > patches I worked on; but currently those are just there > for documentation purposes. Maybe you should differentiate between your own personal working-copies and releases to Debian; for the sake of readability. > So the reason why you see such a messy -12.diff.gz > is that it is a transient situation. Well, allright. How about the other issues I mentioned? - I guess it will save much work if you simply threw out mpdvdkit off the tarball, rename it '+dfsg' or alike, and remove all the checks for the origin of the source etc. I mean, it's a Debian release and thus should expect a dfsg-cleaned tarball; nothing more or less. Hm? - Nevertheless the debian/rules file is still nearly unreadable. There is no consistency in the style of commenting and indentation, lots of empty line etc. The same applies to the README.Debian* files (of course this would also clean up a little bit, if you reduced to the dfsg-source). Again I offer you help to clean up those files. Especially the README.* files since they are expected to be read by the _users_. Hope to hear from you. ;) Cheers, Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
