Hi, This was interesting:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007, Warren Turkal wrote: > Caching device /dev/hda (0x0300) > Warning: LBA32 addressing assumed > Warning: COMPACT may conflict with LBA32 on some systems > raid_setup: dev=000D rdev=6800 > raid_setup returns offset = 00000000 ndisk = 0 => Not sure whether this is normal, seems the RAID is considered empty > pf: dev=6800 id=000A5FF4 name=/dev/cciss/c0d0 > geo_query_dev: device=6800 > lookup_dev: number=6800 > lookup_dev: number=0300 => Seems to be looking at hda for some reason. > Fatal: geo_query_dev HDIO_GETGEO (dev 0x6800): No such device or address > purge: called I'm not sure the error message really reflects the ioctl(). Could you attach a strace (strace -o lilo.strace -f lilo)? Thanks, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>