Petr Salinger, le Thu 01 Feb 2007 08:30:52 +0100, a écrit : > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, LaMont Jones wrote: > > >On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:07:57PM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > >>It incorporates needed changes into debian/patches/30hurd.dpatch > >>and changes debian/rules to ignore failure of "make tidy". > >>On GNU/kFreeBSD and GNU/hurd it fails always when the 30hurd.dpatch > >>is not applied - i.e. also in the initial "clean". > > > >Could I get uname -r output for both distros? Upstream would like that > >prior to including the fix upstream. > > I suppose "-r" is not the wanted switch, all variants for GNU/kFreeBSD > are in http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2006/06/msg00005.html > "uname -r" will currently print "6.2-1-486" or "6.2-1-686" or ... > > Please, could hurd porters send similar output of uname invocation.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -s GNU [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -n gnubber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r 0.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -v GNU-Mach 1.3.99/Hurd-0.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -m i686-AT386 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -o GNU uname -p / -i return unknown. Samuel
