This one time, at band camp, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar said: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: > > >The present situation forces all users of nis&autofs to manually > >shuffle their init scripts around, and this is a very common > >setup... Moving autofs to start later (i.e. at 20) is probably > >unwise (as explained earlier), although this seems to be what most > >users currently do as a workaround. > > > >Maybe we should talk with the release team to get this in? > > If the release team approves that change we'll change portmap to > start at S17 as already suggested by Javier, see #400952 [0].
I may be missing something, but why does it need to be moved? It starts in rcS as well as rc2, so this should only ever be an issue in the rare cases when you have to switch to runlevel 1 and back, right? This seems like a rare enough occurence I'm not sure it's worth worrying about too much, but I may be missing something here. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
