On dim, 2007-01-21 at 16:16 -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > (Granted, it's also an example of why I've constantly railed against > Ubuntu for forking their version of debhelper. If they had paid heed to > that or sent me a debhelper patch to review before deploying it, this > could have possibly been avoided.)
The icon cache use has been discussed several times with the Debian GNOME Team before any work started on that for Ubuntu and there is no mistake which has been done or to "avoid". That was clear from those discussions than pkg-gnome was not wanting to use the current cache implementation and that people are busy enough to not work on that at the moment. The Ubuntu Desktop Team on the other side wanted to get the icon cache used, has no problem with the current implementation and was fine rebuilding the packages installing an icon to update the cache. There was no point then for the Ubuntu team to send you patches for something that the Debian desktop people don't want to use nor to talk again about a topic we debated several times already, we decided to do the work to show how it works for Ubuntu and then to send the patches to Debian with some feedback and let you make your own decision from there Cheers, Sebastien Bacher -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
