Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 05:08:18PM +0200, Teodor wrote: > >> On 1/17/07, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Quoting José Luis Tallón ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >>> >>>> Teodor wrote: >>>> >>>>> Please also correct the PATH for the couriergraph.cgi script. As it is >>>>> already reported on the bug #369839 the correct path is >>>>> /usr/lib/cgi-bin instead of /usr/lib/cgi-lib. >>>>> It should have been /usr/share/cgi-lib ... that was a typo. But I concur: it should go into /usr/lib/cgi-bin just like every other cgi (even though this is arch-indep) -- fixed. > Yes, I'm pretty sure this would be acceptable -- couriergraph is the only > package in the archive using /usr/lib/cgi-lib, so as long as this is a > script that is intended to be invoked directly as a CGI, moving it to the > right place sounds fine Diff attached. I assume it should go via unstable rather than testing-proposed-updates, right ?
Christian, please do upload this version.
Thank you.
J.L.
couriergraph_0.25-2.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
