On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:54:23AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > Did you discuss this with gamin upstream?
No. I thought gamin upstream is dead. > If those aren't implemented in FAM either, shouldn't maybe rather the > FAM wrapper be changed? Possibly, but gamin's aim in the first place is to be API compatible so that applications work without modification. Even for stub functions that happen to be part of the exported API, it seems reasonable. -- Ryan Underwood, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
