Jon Marler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (15/01/2007): > Quoting Thomas Huriaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I don't see any reason to close this bug. If you don't want to fix this > > issue, please tag it as wontfix. > > > > In order to have this bug fixed, I wrote a full patch. Here are my > > comments on the debconf templates, as the rest just depends on these > > fixes: > > The reason to close this bug is that is has been fixed. The problem > was that I included information using debconf that didn't need to be > there. > > All of the qmail-src debconf entries did not fit the policy, and have > been removed. > > I am the package maintainer, and I am allowed to make decisions on > what information is included and displayed when the package is > installed. I have decided that my previous use of debconf has been > deprecated, and therefore, I have no further use for debconf. In > fact, I have removed all dependency on debconf from qmail-src.
Sure, but my patch is for the debconf system used by the *qmail binary* package, not the qmail-src one. Cheers, -- Thomas Huriaux
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
