On 05-Mar-25 14:43, Andreas Jochens wrote: > On 05-Mar-26 00:02, Ben Burton wrote: > > > > > One solution which comes to my mind would be to make 'libgcj-dev' a real > > > package like 'gcj' which is provided by 'gcc-defaults' and depends on > > > the package from the current default gcc version. This would make a > > > Build-Depends on just 'gcj, libgcj-dev' possible. > > > > Indeed, this would be preferable -- when you first filed this bug I took > > a look in the hope that this was the case. Alas it was not. Perhaps > > this is worth taking up with the gcc team? > > I just found BTS #278105 which already requests a 'libgcj-dev' package > to be added to 'gcc-defaults'. I will try to write a patch for > 'gcc-defaults' which implements this.
A new version of gcc-defaults with the 'libgcj-dev' patch applied has just been uploaded to 'unstable'. This will allow to use just 'libgcj-dev' in the Build-Depends. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
