On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 11:37 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > > Unfortunately etch is frozen and since GNU/kFreeBSD is not one of the > > release architectures, we will not be able to get it into etch. > > > > I will upload the upstream fix as soon as etch is released, or I can > > upload one to experimental if you want me to. > > IMHO, you can upload 20060517-2 with one line fix into unstable. > For us it would be much better to have it in unstable now, > it would not hurt releasing of 20060517-1 in etch.
That is correct, but it makes it harder to upload other fixes for etch: they have to go through testing-proposed-updates instead of unstable which I would like to avoid. > In some cases, even GNU/kFreeBSD only fix are accepted for etch, > see http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2007/01/msg00141.html I asked whether this fix would be allowed in and it was denied: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2007/01/msg00676.html > So please, upload 20060517-2 for us into unstable. Since you insist, I will :) Feel free to try to persuade the release managers to get it in etch. -- Adriaan Peeters
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
