On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:33:29 -0800 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #392822: harden-doc: Section on antivirus tools is outdated, > which was filed against the harden-doc package. > > It has been closed by Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [...]
Well done! :) This section seems to be really improved. But... ;-) ...there's still a little typo: | This does not mean that this software can be installed properly in a | Debian system[59]. I think you mean just the opposite: s/can be installed/cannot be installed/ That is to say, even if such software will never be provided by Debian, it is nonetheless possible to install it properly in a Debian system. Moreover, now that I think of it: | However, Debian will never provide commercial antivirus software such | as: Panda Antivirus, [...] Why has Debian decided to never provide such software? Because it's commercial or because it's proprietary? I think that the issue is not that such software is commercialized, but rather that it's non-free (and possibly undistributable). Hence, I think s/never provide commercial/never provide proprietary/ Right? Please reopen the bug (with severity minor). -- http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/releas-o-meter.html Try our amazing Releas-o-meter! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp6tkJeY1Z6i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
