-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jacques Normand wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:26:46PM -0600, Narayan Desai wrote: >> Sami> I agree here, a simple failback to force-reload would be a >> Sami> simple solution. But on a long term it would be a good idea to >> Sami> catch the errors and report them back to the server and >> Sami> possibly attempt reconfigure later. >> >> Should we change the default to force-reload for debinit? it can be >> overridden by using the reload attribute for services. If force-reload >> is mandatory, then we should probably use it. Thoughts? > > That sounds like dangerous. Some daemons really do not like > force-reload. Autofs for example will try to unmount everything on a > force-reload with bad consequences we users are logged in and their > homes mounted.
Hmm.. That should be a bug. Atleast according to LSB documentation, force-reload should be canonical to reload if it's available and restart if it's not. http://www.freestandards.org/spec/booksets/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html I'd err on the side of safe, but in this case there is no safe side. =( - - S -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpWwOqbb3MLg9dhwRAqEzAKCdh46gEDqMpEgiNOOr5cOnPgAEvwCfTVG6 7kzyZ5e6+8QDZq9jKH50x90= =FKv4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
