Package: cups-pdf Version: 2.4.2-1 Severity: wishlist After installing this package, when setting up a printer in CUPS, the user must know that that file;
/usr/share/ppd/cups-pdf/PostscriptColor.ppd Is the correct (or at least sensible default) to use in the CUPS (or GNOME) user interface as a driver. The README.Debian even complains about people getting this wrong, without telling them what the correct thing to do is. Presumably there may also be an issue with CUPS not accepting this information, as a hint to the user interface. But can we at least add this to README.Debian, and preferably hide such details from the end user entirely. I've 15 years Unix admin background, so the hint in the README.Debian was sufficient, but the average end user told they need a specific PPD file is not going to know where it might be, or how to get it, even though it is included with this package. Okay the average end user probably won't read the README.Debian file. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.2 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages cups-pdf depends on: ii cupsys 1.2.7-2 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii gs-esp 8.15.3.dfsg.1-1 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries cups-pdf recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
