* Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Norbert wrote:
> > There's one thing I can do to make everyone happy... provide two
> > binary packages, one called slrn which does not contain the charset
> > patch, and the other one called slrn-utf8 which does contain charset
> > patch.
>
> That's a rather ugly solution, if you ask me.
Agreed.
> Would you rather consider adding a patch as I suggested above, that
> adds a new config option "default_header_charset" or so, which
> controls the charset to fall back to for non-encoded headers?
Of course!
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
