Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sounds good to me. I'm still curious about urgency level semantics. Do > you know when urgency=medium is applicable? The links I found earlier > where not that informative, and mostly said that urgency=high is for > security bugs.
It's basically the maintainer's tradeoff between the urgency of updating testing and the desire to make sure the package is thoroughly tested in unstable. I usually use urgency=medium for serious bugs that don't risk compromise or data loss, or for major bugs with risky fixes that need to be tested in unstable for a while. Since this is a minimal change that fixes an arguably RC bug and adds support for a major platform, urgency of high or medium is probably appropriate here, but I'm not sure that it matters a great deal. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
