Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Uploading 0.0.19 to Debian at this time is surely a bad idea. Should we > raise the severity of this bug to serious, since it is FTBFS, and do > another upload of 0.0.18 plus the minimal patch that solve the bug? Or > is it not worth another upload? Not supporting amd64 seems like an > unfortunate thing, but maybe it is too late to get into etch. I don't > really know the best practice for this.
We should raise the severity of the bug to grave (better than serious, since it's a usability issue, not a policy violation) and upload a new 0.0.18 version with the minimal patch. I think the release team will be happy with that. > FWIW, the minimal patch is the one below. I don't really know how to > apply it with cdbs, but I recall seeing other packages do it, so I could > easily take care of that tomorrow. Given that this will be fairly temporary, I would use the simple-patchsys class in CDBS, which should be up to applying a single patch without much difficulty. Let me know when that's set and I'll do the upload. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
