Dear Everyone, I am going to adopt the package lush (so it doesn't get removed from Debian) under Debian GNU/Linux OS, thus I want to fix few bugs before I upload it under my name.
This is a follow-up to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=243501 lush_1.0+cvs.2004.04.02(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: errors during data file build and relevant to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267494 M/P-a-s: lush [ia64] -- RoM; ia64-ELF issues It seems that this issue is no longer existent on ia64 platform for sid. Please see full build log (running within uptodate sid ia64 chroot using pdebuild) http://www.onerussian.com/Linux/bugs/lush/ia64/lush-build.log (also built fine within a chroot on ia64 debian box) Absent upstream changelog forbids me to guess what upstream release/change has fixed this bug, but current sid version seems to build fine and runs as well (or as bad) as on any other platform (during simple testing), thus I question a statement made in #267494: "Lush does not work on ia64, and it is only accidental that past builds worked.". It *does* work on ia64 and was working - it just wasn't building right ;-) Dear maintainers of packages-arch-specific, please remove lush entry (which was marked as ANAIS so not fully inspected if I understood that abbreviate correctly ;-)), so it could be built in a regular fashion for ia64, and would allow me to close relevant bug. Thanks everyone in advance -- .-. =------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------= Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192 Linux User ^^-^^ [175555]
pgpAkDY54aZ4s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
