On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:50:54 +0200 "Eng. Mina Ramses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm some bit confused, is > Jing<http://sponsors.debian.net/viewpkg.php?id=99>packaged or is it > requested to be packaged It was requested to be packaged some time ago (Tue, 02 Mar 2004) but no package materialised (it is still an RFP, not an ITP) so the RFP was closed due to lack of interest by an automated script. >, cause already i see a .deb > package <http://www.uft.uni-bremen.de/chemie/ranke/debs/sarge-jr/> That isn't an official Debian package, it's someone's personal repository. (A bit like mine that contains demo packages which are often broken or incomplete). > At the same time I'm posting this message to its bug RFP that has been > closed which mean as i think that no work is going on it until someone > reopen the bug. The RFP needs to be reopened if you are requesting the package to be included into Debian. If you want to package jing for Debian yourself, reopen the RFP and retitle it as an ITP with all the usual details and then seek a sponsor when you have a package prepared. There does not appear to have been any upstream activity since 2003 so are you also willing to do all the upstream work? (When upstream is dead, the Debian maintainer takes responsibility for fixing upstream bugs.) -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpXLz4762Uos.pgp
Description: PGP signature
