Also, sprach Jurij Smakov am Donnerstag, den 28. Dezember 2006 um 18:14: > > A patch is included in http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/23/184: > > This patch looks ok, I'll push it in.
Coolio! > > $ sshfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/smc phobos/ > > Kernel unaligned access at TPC[5d3770] scm_detach_fds_compat+0x74/0x16c > > Kernel unaligned access at TPC[5d37dc] scm_detach_fds_compat+0xe0/0x16c > > Kernel unaligned access at TPC[5d37f8] scm_detach_fds_compat+0xfc/0x16c > > Kernel unaligned access at TPC[5d3810] scm_detach_fds_compat+0x114/0x16c > > Bus-Zugriffsfehler > > $ ls phobos > > ls: phobos: Transport endpoint is not connected > > There are two things here: first, the unaligned accesses in kernel. > Those, as Steve pointed out, are harmless, and should not have any > noticeable effect except for slight performance impact (I'll have a > look at them). However, after that sshfs actually dies with bus error, > which is an indication of alignment problems in sshfs itself. I'm > cloning this bug report and reassigning a copy to sshfs. Please > download and install the sshfs package with debugging symbols included > from > > http://www.wooyd.org/debian/sshfs > > and run it under gdb as follows: > > $ gdb sshfs > (gdb) set args [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/smc phobos/ > (gdb) run > > After program terminates with bus error, type 'backtrace' at the gdb > prompt and send the output to the sshfs bug report. I have done so and will send the output to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as soon as I am done with this mail. Thanks for your fast responses! It makes me having this warm and fuzzy feeling inside to know that the people responsible do actually care :). Greetings, -- : Sebastian Fontius : www.fsfe.org : www.fsfe.org/en/fellows/smc `--------+----------+--------------+-----------------------------------. [] | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little | [][][] | temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." | || : Benjamin Franklin, 1759 :
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
