Hi, On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 09:37:36PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm the upstream man-pages maintainer. Thanks for your wonderful patches! > (How did you get all of this stuff?)
That's the advantages of translation and translation reviews: you have to read the fucking manuals;) > The changes listed below will appear in upstream 2.44. Thanks. > > --- ../orig/manpages-2.39/man3/error.3 2006-12-21 23:25:37.000000000 > > +0100 > > +++ ./manpages-2.39/man3/error.3 2006-12-21 23:31:57.000000000 +0100 > > @@ -65,10 +65,12 @@ > > The program name printed by > > .BR error () > > is the value of the global variable > > -.IR program_invocation_name. > > -.IR program_invocation_name has the the same initial value as > > +.IR program_invocation_name . > > +.I program_invocation_name > > +has the same initial value as > > .IR main ()'s > > -.IR argv[0] ), and is > > +.IR argv[0] ), > > +and is > > declared as > > .IR "extern char *program_invocation_name" > > in > > diff -rauN ../orig/manpages-2.39/man3/fopen.3 ./manpages-2.39/man3/fopen.3 > > *** This does not apply. Please recheck an up-to-date page. It's OK, already fixed. > > --- ../orig/manpages-2.39/man7/man.7 2006-12-21 23:25:37.000000000 > > +0100 > > +++ ./manpages-2.39/man7/man.7 2006-12-22 20:22:10.000000000 +0100 > > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ > > .I title > > .SH DESCRIPTION > > This manual page explains the > > -.B "groff tmac.an" > > +.B "groff an.tmac" > > macro package (often called the > > .B man > > macro package) and related conventions for creating manual (man) pages. > > diff -rauN ../orig/manpages-2.39/man7/mdoc.7 ./manpages-2.39/man7/mdoc.7 > > *** Can you please give me further details on this? I don't know whether > this change is correct. I assumed "groff tmac.an" means the tmac.an file distributed by groff. But, at least on Debian, the file distributed by groff is /usr/share/groff/1.18.1/tmac/an.tmac > > diff -rauN ../orig/manpages-2.39/man3/iconv_open.3 > > ./manpages-2.39/man3/iconv_open.3 > > --- ../orig/manpages-2.39/man3/iconv_open.3 2006-08-03 15:57:30.000000000 > > +0200 > > +++ ./manpages-2.39/man3/iconv_open.3 2006-12-21 23:40:37.000000000 > > +0100 > > @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ > > for converting byte sequences from character encoding \fIfromcode\fP to > > character encoding \fItocode\fP. > > .PP > > +.\" According to iconv --list: > > +.\" "This does not necessarily mean that all combinations of these names > > +.\" can be used for the FROM and TO command line parameters." > > +.\" Who's right? > > *** Where does the text that you are quoting come from? > (no changes, yet) > > > The values permitted for \fIfromcode\fP and \fItocode\fP and the supported > > combinations are system dependent. For the GNU C library, the permitted > > values are listed by the \fBiconv \-\-list\fP command, and all combinations I propose to replace "all combinations of the listed values are supported" by "but not all combinations of the listed values are supported" (I assumed iconv --list is right) Patch applied. Kind Regards, -- Nekral
--- man3/iconv_open.3.orig 2006-12-27 22:41:15.000000000 +0100 +++ man3/iconv_open.3 2006-12-27 22:42:49.000000000 +0100 @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ .PP The values permitted for \fIfromcode\fP and \fItocode\fP and the supported combinations are system dependent. For the GNU C library, the permitted -values are listed by the \fBiconv \-\-list\fP command, and all combinations +values are listed by the \fBiconv \-\-list\fP command, but not all combinations of the listed values are supported. .PP The resulting conversion descriptor can be used with \fBiconv\fP() any number
