On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 09:10:57AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:39:04AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:56:42AM +0100, Bas Kloet wrote: > > > Package: liblablgtk2-ocaml > > > Version: 2.4.0+2004.11.19-3 > > > Severity: grave > > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > > > > > > This package depends on ocaml-base-3.08, but it should simply depend on > > > ocaml-base. This renders it uninstallable. > > > > Please, did you read the ocaml changelog ? The ocaml-base-3.08 is there on > > purpose, and it shoulod most defenitively be there, since ocaml releases are > > binary incompatible, forcing us to do a full rebuild each time a new version > > is released. This is currently underway, and i uploaded the fixed lablgtk2 > > yesterday evening after dinstall, so it should show up in the archive this > > evening. It was a wee bit too early, and it failed to build on hppa, ia64 > > and > > s390, because the lablgl dependency altough built, failed to upload in time. > > > > If you don't feel like getting such random breakages of unstable, just run > > testing :) > > > > Closing this bug which is not really a bug but a feature. > > Well, it still is a bug in unstable, even if we (the ocaml maintainers) > know that it is only transitory. I have already tagged the bug report as > "pending" and the RM has tagged it as "sid" , but I don't think it should > be closed until a new liblablgtk2-ocaml is uploaded which is > installable with ocaml-* from unstable.
Its already in the incoming queue, and on the PTS, so ican be closed. The bug came after the upload, so i couldn't close it in the changelog. There was another bug report against lablgtk2 i think where ia laso replied, so he didn't check. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
