Well, the short story is 0ubuntu2 claimed to fix the ^I but didn't --
cat -A still reveals the same ^I.
I'm using 0.161ubuntu1, which still fails to resolve dependencies with
the following error:
-> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.29
2006/11/06 20:20:56 lool Exp $
-> Considering build-dep debhelper (>= 5.0.0)
-> Trying debhelper
-> Considering build-dep gnome-pkg-tools
-> Trying gnome-pkg-tools
-> Considering build-dep autotools-dev
-> Trying autotools-dev
-> Considering build-dep cdbs
-> Trying cdbs
-> Considering build-dep libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.12)
-> Trying libglib2.0-dev
-> Considering build-dep libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.10)
-> Trying libgtk2.0-dev
-> Considering build-dep libgnome2-dev (>=
dpkg: --compare-versions bad relation
Type dpkg --help for help about installing and deinstalling packages
[*];
Use `dselect' or `aptitude' for user-friendly package management;
Type dpkg -Dhelp for a list of dpkg debug flag values;
Type dpkg --force-help for a list of forcing options;
Type dpkg-deb --help for help about manipulating *.deb files;
Type dpkg --license for copyright license and lack of warranty (GNU GPL)
[*].
Options marked [*] produce a lot of output - pipe it through `less' or
`more' !
Tried versions: 2.16.0-0ubuntu1
-> Does not satisfy version, not trying
E: Could not satisfy build-dependency.
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 17:15 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006, John Dong wrote:
> > Launchpad keeps a pretty good history of previous revisions, at:
> > https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/xchat-gnome/1:0.15-0ubuntu1
>
> Just for the record, I did do my homework and searched for this
> particular version:
> <http://people.dooz.org/~lool/debian/launchpad-xchat-gnome.png>
> Thanks for the pointer I couldn't find by myself!
>
> I've grabbed ubuntu1, and I see zero difference with ubuntu2 (apart of
> changelog):
> bee% interdiff -z -p1 0.15-0ubuntu1/xchat-gnome_0.15-0ubuntu1.diff.gz \
> 0.15-0ubuntu2/xchat-gnome_0.15-0ubuntu2.diff.gz | lsdiff
> xchat-gnome-0.15/debian/changelog
>
> Since I was able to build ubuntu2 (see attached log) past the
> pbuilder-satisfydepends phase, I'm a bit puzzled as of why you
> couldn't.
>
> Are you sure you did your tests with pbuilder 0.161?
>
> Bye,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
