#include <hallo.h>
* Joerg Schilling [Tue, Dec 19 2006, 11:15:58AM]:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I am aware of what the strings are used for.  Can you point out the
> > section of the license that says that copyright must be conveyed as a
> > char string in the binary?  I only see that it should be kept in the
> > source file, which it is.  Can you please demonstrate copyright breach,
> > instead of continuing to repeat your wishes?
> 
> It is interesting to see that Debian people on one side publish unsubstancial 
> claims against my software and on the other side ignore explanations.
> 
> You are mot allowed to remove Copyright notices that are part of the work.
> 
> I recommend you to read the related law:
> 
>       http://transpatent.com/gesetze/urhg.html
> 
> In special UrhG §13:
> 
> § 13
> Anerkennung der Urheberschaft
> 
> Der Urheber hat das Recht auf Anerkennung seiner Urheberschaft am Werk. Er 
> kann 
> bestimmen, ob das Werk mit einer Urheberbezeichnung zu versehen und welche 
>                                                               XXXXXXXXXX
> Bezeichnung zu verwenden ist.
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Yes, and? Of course there is the §13 which describes the skeleton of the
law. And if you continue reading, you will find things like

§ 31
Einräumung von Nutzungsrechten

When you have understood it, I suggest you reread your license where
you gave a lot of permissions including modification and distribution of
modified works.

> and read the GPL (note that GPL §2 (c is also ignored by Debian......).

§2c is not ignored. You continue telling this myth while you
deliberately ignore the word "interactive" therein or while you try to
find some perverse definition for that term. In common sense,
interactive stands for a real-time dialogue with the user which is
not (or hardly) the case here.

> And please do not try to have an endless discussion, I don't have the time
> to have endless discussions.....

There would be no discussion if you would listen to other arguments at
least once. Instead you present the same myths (aka rebutted
pseudo-arguments) again and again. If you want to stop, you can do it at
any time.

Eduard.

-- 
<weaselTM> aber /me wollte ins bett. nacht
<cw80> hehe, morgen channel, nacht weasel ;)

Reply via email to