On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:50:39PM +0100, Frank K??ster wrote: > Thinking again, I came to the conclusion that it is a bad thing. In > SVN, I have removed the parts of patch-src that add libpaper support to > the dvipdfm binary, instead we will use the patch in this bug report. > After enhancing it with the necessary tweaks to get a nice, clean > configuration file handling. > > Which requires some more thinking... > > I don't think this is for etch, though, at least not with very thorough > testing in unstable. Should we start a branch, or only do it when we > actually need a further upload targetted at etch?
I think this counts as a significant change, and therefore would not want to see it in etch - who knows what bugs it might cause? Can we leave it for lenny, please? (We could start a new branch for this and upload to experimental, if we're desperate to test it before etch is released.) Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
