* Peter J. Holzer wrote: > On 2006-12-11 22:42:20 +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > * Peter J. Holzer wrote: > > > Or is there another reason why the patch is included in the > > > source but disabled? > > > > Because it's not the way upstream decided to go. A package based > > on the current upstream cvs is available in experimental. > > True. And I was hoping it would make into testing before the freeze. > But that hasn't happened, and I would prefer a not-quite-perfect > slrn in Etch to a seriously buggy slrn in Etch. It's not buggy, it's just missing a feature. > > > Can the patch be reenabled for Etch? > > > > I don't think it's a good idea, the problem Eduard reported in > > this bugreport still exists. > > Which one? The original problem seems to be fixed. (I read mostly > German newsgroups and haven't noticed any problems with correctly > declared charsets (mostly iso-8859-1, iso-8859-15 and utf-8, but > also others). > > I don't think I've seen the issue reported in > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=316919;msg=42 since > applying the patch, either (but I remember seeing it before). Okay, I'll take a look at it next weekend. Norbert
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
