On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 07:26:25PM +0100, Marco Tulio Gontijo e Silva wrote: > Hello John! > > I haven't noticed that instance SqlType (Maybe a), it's a workaround, > but I still prefer the solution with my patch. In what do you consider > that it could be harmful? The problem for me is just that filter (==
The problem is that you convert a SQL NULL value to a string "SqlNull". That string is indistinguishable from a field that contains the literal string "SqlNull". That, in fact, is why the SQL NULL value is not a string. It is specifically designed to be not representable as a string, and trying to represent it as a string is an error. > don't know about instance SqlType (Maybe a). Maybe more documentation > about it would be sufficient. I could indeed highlight this. -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
