On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 09:03:24AM -0500, James Vega wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:40:59PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:50:24PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote: > > > Hi, I noticed that the default color schema of vimdiff is wrong, since > > > added lines in one of the files are not visible because foreground and > > > background color are identical. > > This depends on the colorscheme. The default colorscheme does make > Comment that are part of a DiffAdd hard to read. Although, in my case > it was because the 'background' option was set to 'light' when I had a > dark background on my terminal. Setting 'background' to 'dark' fixed > the problem.
Indeed, using :set background=dark (in a bright *and* dark terminal) improves the situation. Please note that I tried all colorschemes also in an inversed terminal (but without background=dark). The contrast is nevertheless bad. Bright blue on blue or pink on red are not optimal. The older settings where better. The contrast can be calculated as described in http://www.w3.org/TR/AERT#color-contrast (the RGB color space in not optimal). Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
