Hi,
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:02:24 +0100, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 03:32:07PM -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> * Bug fix: "ucf: please provide infrastructure to remove deleted
>> conffiles", thanks to Marc Haber (Closes: #358552).
> I do not see any changes to address this issue in the diff between
> 2.008 and 2.009. May I ask whether you forgot to commit a patch?
Umm, no. ucfq and ucfr were added in that time frame.
According to the bug report, you wanted the following things:
* Have a list of ex-conffiles to manually process them on postinst
and probably postrm.
Provided by ucfq.
* Have a mechanism to leave them alone if they have been manually
changed
* determine manual change
provided by ucfq
* Ask the user whether to delete the changed ucf-conffile on
purge
* Have a mechanism to specify defaults for this question to
prevent it from being asked on pool systems
provided by debconf.
So, all the infrastructure required for handling ancient
conffiles is now in place for the maintainer to use as they wish.
manoj
--
"Elves and Dragons!" I says to him. "Cabbages and potatoes are better
for you and me." -- J. R. R. Tolkien
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
