On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 12:07 +0100, Fabrice LORRAIN wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 13:28 +0100, Fabrice LORRAIN wrote:
> > 
> >>Package: mpi-doc
> >>Version: 1.2.5.3-1.2
> >>Followup-For: Bug #299198
> >>
> >>
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>Just to let you know that this conflict is in sarge nowadays.
> >>
> >>I guess that my initial severity is under-evaluated. serious seems more
> >>appropriate.
> > 
> > 
> > Right, though it's not clear which package is more appropriate for this
> > bug. 
> 
> Hi Adam,
> 
> Right, I tend to BTS this kind of bug against the last package on my box 
> who generate the conflict. It would be nice to be able to report such a 
> bug against both packages so the DDs could get in touch ASAP.
> 
> Ideally, those kind of bugs should never hit the BTS and should be taken 
> care before the upload either at ftp-master level or at any quality 
> testing tool before.

Actually, I'm grateful for your report, without which I would not have
known about the conflict or contacted Camm (lam maintainer) about this
issue. :-)

Thank you, I look forward to resolving this.

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!
http://www.take6.com/albums/greatesthits.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to