On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:59:20PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Good question. As the former maintainer has vanished, we may have hard > times finding whether this was deliberate or not.
It was probably deliberate at some point because it might have an issue with that. If that was the case it's no longer true. > Anyway, I'm very reluctant to make this change now so it's likely to > be post-sarge. Apart from that, I tend to agree with Javier, > particularly if other software using PAM have chosen to enable > pam_limits It's a very safe change, actually, I asked this to the cron package maintainer too (see #300725) and he has no issue changing that package. Regards Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
