org, which was given no protection.
That is the link to the patent agreement.
We had no inside track but, as a group, we had the technical and legal
knowledge required to call this one accurately, even though at the
beginning, we had to stand alone. It's looking to kill the GPL.
They mention the patent aspect of the deal, by the way, prominently.

&&&&&

*MAKU* IMMENSE COVERAGE *MAKU*

Trade Date:   Monday, December 4, 2006
Company Name: MAKEUP LIMITED (OTC BB:MAKU.OB)
Symbol:       MAKU
Last Trade:   $0.61
MAKU Target:  $2

Why get in MAKU? Don't if "profit" is not in your vocabulary.

JUST WATCH MAKU TRADE NEXT MONDAY, DECEMBER 4TH!

&&&&&

Just one more manufactured smear against IBM that doesn't bear close
examination.
You can choose for yourself which way you'd like to view the exhibits.
is on a roll and has bumped up target prices for the company's stock.
And so, what they face at trial is awful to contemplate, if you are a
friend of SCO's.
Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells ruled from the bench in favor of IBM.
It gives customers confidence that the technologies they use and deploy
in their environments are compliant with the two companies' patents.
org, and  the GPL wasn't implicated in any way. How could anyone doubt
them? I suspect they are making deals with every entity that has
patents, clearing the deck  so it can attack Red Hat and the entire Open
Source method of development. I suspect they are making deals with every
entity that has patents, clearing the deck  so it can attack Red Hat and
the entire Open Source method of development. I'm told there will be
audio and video of most of the talks soon. The most  that happened, as
far as I can see,  was SCO's attorneys asked some trick questions and
got a couple of confused answers at  deposition, later corrected,  and
the rest is the bogo part.
Neither Sun  nor Microsoft made any statements implying or stating that
Microsoft patents were in Linux and needed to be paid for,  and Sun made
no such payments.
They mention the patent aspect of the deal, by the way, prominently.
They said they'd turn everything relevant over to Novell in plenty of
time, and they did so.
A couple of readers have sent me their UK newsletter, and it's a pip.
The solution, should one need one, would be not to use or develop for
OpenOffice.
It's the overwhelming choice of license, so the Novell deal implicates
their work. Talk about disappointed.
You'll laugh, snort, and then  perhaps get mad at SCO, if you're like me
and have a sense of justice.
No IBM executives sent any directives telling folks to destroy evidence.
These should be fun, so synchronize your watches and make whatever
arrangements you can. StarOffice was protected, which kind of put a bit
of shade over OpenOffice. Whatever isn't there as PDF in the exhibits
list is redacted or easily available on the Internet or already in our
collection.
That, of course, is precisely SCO's difficulty.
Just one more manufactured smear against IBM that doesn't bear close
examination.
It's hard to focus on SCO  when we're now into Son of SCO.
org, which was given no protection. Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells ruled
from the bench in favor of IBM. org, and there are many alternatives.
That is why they care, and that is the difference.
Our Cool Stuff holiday gift guide can help with recommendations on the
best in large-screen TVs, digital cameras, smart phones and more.
Whatever is left standing will be firmly inside Microsoft's embrace, and
you know as well as I do what that historically means.
So, the court has nothing to compel.
php - FOR PERSONAL AND NON COMMERCIAL USE ONLY! That, of course, is
precisely SCO's difficulty. StarOffice was protected, which kind of put
a bit of shade over OpenOffice. So who can and who can't? SCO, as you'll
recall, did some FUDding in the media about alleged spoliation, which
some SCO-supporting media types lapped up to the very last drop and made
sound like a big deal. That, of course, is precisely SCO's difficulty.
I'm told there will be audio and video of most of the talks soon. We had
no inside track but, as a group, we had the technical and legal
knowledge required to call this one accurately, even though at the
beginning, we had to stand alone.
So who can and who can't? SCO, as you'll recall, did some FUDding in the
media about alleged spoliation, which some SCO-supporting media types
lapped up to the very last drop and made sound like a big deal. These
should be fun, so synchronize your watches and make whatever
arrangements you can.
Wells' order threw out most of SCO's evidence.
You'll laugh, snort, and then  perhaps get mad at SCO, if you're like me
and have a sense of justice.
Whatever isn't there as PDF in the exhibits list is redacted or easily
available on the Internet or already in our collection.
A couple of readers have sent me their UK newsletter, and it's a pip.
Whatever isn't there as PDF in the exhibits list is redacted or easily
available on the Internet or already in our collection.
A few developers may not care much about the GPL, but most care very
much.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to