Unloading the dishwasher is much more faster than it would be if I had to take individual forks out of random sub-bins. We know that people, not tools or methodologies, are what makes projects succeed. Dog-paddling is not an efficient way to swim, but it is natural. They make your tests larger and more complicated and less readable. Their heads are in the water, not above it, sipping air now and then from the side, and their feet are near the surface. Refactoring applies to any type of coding including test scripts.
6666 *MAKU* IMMENSE COVERAGE *MAKU* Trade Date: Monday, December 4, 2006 Company Name: MAKEUP LIMITED (OTC BB:MAKU.OB) Symbol: MAKU Last Trade: $0.61 MAKU Target: $2 Why get in MAKU? Don't if "profit" is not in your vocabulary. JUST WATCH MAKU TRADE NEXT MONDAY, DECEMBER 4TH! 6666 You pre-judge the class design rather than evolve it. USD JPY is in a consolidation after the last bearish movement. Often with libraries that were not designed with TDD in mind, such as the TWAIN libraries used for controlling scanners and implementing scanner-drivers. I think the Agile Manifesto works from a testing point of view as well as from a coding point of view. Thinking about coding, or actually coding, during the analysis phase. USD JPY is in a consolidation after the last bearish movement. Bollinger bands are parallel and form the trend. The speaker's example was the process of swimming. Bollinger bands are parallel and form the trend. We know that people, not tools or methodologies, are what makes projects succeed. My car has maybe a dozen CPUs running software for anti-lock brakes, digital dashboard, monitoring and controlling the engine, and so on. And since you fixed bugs during TDD, you have much less work fixing bugs later when it comes time to ship your product. Refactoring applies to any type of coding including test scripts. The speaker's example was the process of swimming. Bollinger bands are parallel and form the trend. If a Mock generated from an interface was used instead of Stub, there would be a disconnect. Bollinger bands are parallel and form the trend. I think the Agile Manifesto works from a testing point of view as well as from a coding point of view. This depends on whether you are using a Mock-generating framework, or not, and how your mock object is implemented or how the Mock-generating framework is implemented. The fact that an agile process is built around an understanding that it takes people to make something work and that we're not automatons is a great enabler for improvements. Their heads are in the water, not above it, sipping air now and then from the side, and their feet are near the surface. Often with libraries that were not designed with TDD in mind, such as the TWAIN libraries used for controlling scanners and implementing scanner-drivers. All I did was facilitate the change, lead a little bit by example to get things started and then get out of their way. I limit my use of Mocks to those situations where the real object will not reliably do what I want. The volatility is high. By driving coding with customer-facing tests, we're more likely to deliver what the customer wanted. All I did was facilitate the change, lead a little bit by example to get things started and then get out of their way. Examples: simulating errors in writing a file; simulating connections with a remote server; simulating errors from remote server. The volatility is high. If you change an object's API, a mock object's API may not change, making your tests out-of-date with respect to your non-test code. Collaborating helps communication, so testers should get together with programmers and with customers from the start of a project, as well as pairing with each other. I've heard people come up with some great one-liners but then I can't remember them. Bollinger bands are parallel and form the trend. Dog-paddling is not an efficient way to swim, but it is natural. Such leadership must extinguish courage. Collaborating helps communication, so testers should get together with programmers and with customers from the start of a project, as well as pairing with each other. The fact that an agile process is built around an understanding that it takes people to make something work and that we're not automatons is a great enabler for improvements. Test-Driving with Mocks inverts that order: you create your target class and a mock class up-front, and plan on how they interact, instead of evolving that interaction in TDD's refactoring steps. By driving coding with customer-facing tests, we're more likely to deliver what the customer wanted. You pre-judge the class design rather than evolve it. I think the Agile Manifesto works from a testing point of view as well as from a coding point of view. There may be a little more effort when writing code, because you are writing programmer-tests to drive writing that code. Examples: simulating errors in writing a file; simulating connections with a remote server; simulating errors from remote server. There may be a little more effort when writing code, because you are writing programmer-tests to drive writing that code. Retrospectives are the single most important practice I can think of for any team, because you can't improve without identifying and focusing on what you need to improve. Retrospectives are the single most important practice I can think of for any team, because you can't improve without identifying and focusing on what you need to improve. Thinking about coding, or actually coding, during the analysis phase. They make your tests larger and more complicated and less readable. Untrained persons, thrown into deep water, either drown or dog-paddle. Anything we can do to allow ourselves to do our best work fits my definition of 'agile'. Such leadership must create enemies. State what I wanted to do and take no prisoners in implementing the change. I prefer to have failing tests tell me when behavior is changing. And since you fixed bugs during TDD, you have much less work fixing bugs later when it comes time to ship your product. Thinking about coding, or actually coding, during the analysis phase. Examples: simulating errors in writing a file; simulating connections with a remote server; simulating errors from remote server. Their heads are in the water, not above it, sipping air now and then from the side, and their feet are near the surface. I limit my use of Mocks to those situations where the real object will not reliably do what I want. The volatility is high. Dog-paddling is not an efficient way to swim, but it is natural. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
