On December 3, 2006 at 7:22AM +0100, bubulle (at debian.org) wrote: > Quoting Tatsuya Kinoshita ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Hi Fumitoshi, the Debian mhc maintainer, > > > > On December 2, 2006 at 6:09PM +0100, > > bubulle (at debian.org) wrote: > > > > > The mhc Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has > > > longstanding bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes > > > for po-debconf. At least one of these is older than 100 days, namely > > > bug number 333761 (it is pretty likely that several other translation > > > bug reports are pending). > > > > If you are busy and/or lost interest in the mhc package, please > > allow me to take over the mhc package by me. If so, I'll update > > the mhc package immediately to fix bugs #333761, #377457 and #377455. > > That would be good if Fumitoshi is OK...or can't/doesn't answer. > > What I suggest, however, if leaving time to me to conclude this "l10n > NMU" round. Given the lintian warnings, I fixed the debconf templates > for writing style and I would need translators to update it. > > What I propose you, Kinoshita-san, is that I re-get in touch with you > when I'll send the announcement to translators, at the end of the 7 > days delay which I usually leave to the maintainer for reaction. At > this moment, I would send a "call for updates" to translators and then > give then another 7 days delay to update. See the original > announcement. > > Then, instead of NMU'ing the package, I send you the whole patch and > you can adopt the package with a first upload with this patch. > > Would that be a correct plan for you?
I agree to your proposal. Thanks, -- Tatsuya Kinoshita
pgpe122SYyJRP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
