Hi Erik, On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 12:16 +0100, Erik Meusel wrote: > since libneon26-dev and libneon26-gnutls-dev seem to have no notable > differences, [...] Well, never made a diff between them.
> [...] why don't you just > make libneon26-dev depend on either libneon26 or libneon26-gnutls? So one > could easily migrate the > neon-fired applications with automagically adapted binary dependencies to > GnuTLS by recompiling them > against a libneon26-dev depending on libneon26-gnutls. But what would choose libneon26 or libneon26-gnutls during the compilation phase? The buildds only know that the build dependency is libneon26-dev and blindly choose the first alternative dependent package, libneon26 this time. So everything would be linked with the OpenSSL version of neon which is just wrong. Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
