On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 07:00:14AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > There's no possibility of including that patch upstream. > > > > So what? If upstream does not want to accept a patch that fixes a > > so what? Read the patch. You certainly didn't, or if you _did_ you > understand nothing of the change. > > The patch breaks existing functionality (hardcodes one of the configurable > selections).
I didn't know PERSONAL_MAILCAP was run-time configurable (it looks
a #define to me). If apt-get source wasn't segfaulting at the moment I'd
check it. But this explaination is a lot more useful than "upstream
won't accept it". But why did you send this to the debian-devel mailing
list instead of as a follow-up to the bugreport?
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
