* Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-26 01:09]: > I am having second toughts about this. > I agree with the hwclock maintainer, there is no point in having two > names for the same device: http://lkml.org/lkml/fancy/2006/3/29/334 . > Why can't hwclock be fixed instead?
Indeed, I read something about this on lkml a few days ago and it seemed like hwclock would get patched to deal with /dev/rtcX. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
