Package: hpoj Version: 0.91-10 Severity: minor This sentence in README.Debian has unnecessary technical jargon, spelling mistakes and ambiguity:
"Upstream development for HP multifunction devices has been overtake by the HPLIP package, if you are running a USB or JetDirect interface you proably want to use HPLIP instead." I believe it would read better as: 'If you have a Hewlett-Packard multifunction device with a USB or JetDirect interface you would be better served by the 'hplip' package' (yes, I know one of the spelling mistakes is in bug 363933)
