On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 09:03:34PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > reassign 399384 r-cran-fmultivar > > found 399384 221.10064a-1 > > close 399384 240.10068-1 > > thanks
> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 09:32:37AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> Package: r-cran-fmultivar > >> Version: 240.10068-1 > >> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1-12), libgfortran1 (>= > >> 4.1.1-12), r-base-core (>= 2.4.0), r-cran-fbasics, r-cran-fseries, > >> r-cran-fcalendar, r-cran-fecofin, r-cran-mvtnorm, r-cran-mgcv > >> There seems to be a mismatch between the libgfortran library in > >> Depends and the one actualy used. > > No, you're simply reporting this bug against a different version of > > r-cran-fmultivar than the one that was actually used in your build. > Sorry. I missed that the version moved into testing between the > compile and me reporting the bug. FWIW, it had not; it only moved into testing after you filed the bug, because the sparc build had gotten stuck due to uninstallable build-deps and I gave the build back in reaction to your bug report. ;) So you might want to still double-check how you're determining the versions of packages to file these bugs against. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
