Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> tags 184966 moreinfo

> Hrmz, again I think your mail took a little while to get looked at, is
> there something pre-sarge that really should be done on this? I'm a bit
> confused at this all, and assume that if something was important or so,
> you'd have said so...
> 
> If there's something concrete to change, please tell.

This issue seems to me to be independant of the sarge release, since
AFAIK nothing cares if a package is in the base section or not. It could
be fixed before or after sarge.

If there's some specific peice of information you need, please let me
know; I don't understand why the report should be marked moreinfo.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to