Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > [dll] init: initializing backend `mustek' >> >> Does it stop at this point ? If yes, try to comment the mustek backend >> in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf. Might be the mustek backend hanging on the >> parallel port or something. > > Commenting out mustek and makes it scanimage stopping at hpsj5s. Commenting > out hpsj5s as well makes scanimage returning....
OK, somehow both backends didn't like what you had on your parallel port, it seems. > ...but it is still not fully working: > > silverboxy:~# scanimage -L > device `umax1220u:libusb:001:005' is a UMAX Astra 1220U flatbed scanner > silverboxy:~# scanimage --lamp-off --device-name=umax1220u:libusb:001:005 > scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument > silverboxy:~# Does scanning as a user work ? Could you try to unplug the scanner, plug it in again, and try to scan (without running scanimage -L first)? If that works, try moving umax1220u at the top of the list in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf, and try running scanimage -L then scanimage. If it works that way, then the scanner is getting confused by another backend checking for one of its supported devices. > I am just wondering, was there recently a sane upgrade in sarge (or why do I > see now all these issues???). Not in the last 3 weeks. 1.0.15-8 will hit Sarge in a couple of days. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | <http://www.debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
