Quoting Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:55 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > BTW, given the contents of this debconf message, is it better to remove the > > package anyway...? > Ouch, I should have noted all debconf translators that this package is > _deprecated_ and it does not worth translating it. Well, they seen it > anyway while translating so... > Anyway Steve, I will upload a transition package to gradm2 this week. > Then gradm can be removed. Maybe a simple remove would be OK? Their > policy is different and can not be converted; the only reason for a > transition package is to make it disappear from user's boxes.
Seems fine by me. And before anyone says it, no problem for me or translators doing useless work....the work has not been useless as, without it, we would never had removed the package..:-) So, Laszlo, I'd say "go for it".
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
