Hi Rob, Currently I made some little corrections because of the big instability I observed myself on this version software. With theses little patchs I think the software would be stable enought to ensure a minimum usage by users and also a big thing from my point of view : to permit the installation if you are today using anything else that unstable debian distribution.
I have concentrate this work on this baseline because I also remark that Anjuta 2 more unstable under my distribution today (debian testing). (FYI: it make X crash on my side) Your remark is interesting, I was also thinking to bring some help to Anjuta's developpers. I will contact them soon. Concerning the 383949 bug, I know this is more that a simple patch but a real new developpment. You can integrate it or not, no problem with that. Maybe upstream developpers can validate this... Regards, Yannick 2006/11/14, Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 19:48 +0100, Yannick Gicquel wrote: > Hi, > > This is a proposal for this feature implementation. > > Because the resolved patch use a new developped function interface in > file managment, it needs to be validate by project leader to confirm > general software behaviour. > Yannick, Anjuta 1.2.* is no longer actively maintained by upstream. Instead they are working on Anjuta 2. Perhaps you might like to join in the work? See http://www.anjuta.org for more information. And although I will of course apply the bug-fixes that you sent me i'd hate to deviate too much from the upstream version. Cheers, Rob -- Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
