-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rene Engelhard schrieb: > Hi, > > Am Freitag, 10. November 2006 14:44 schrieb André Wendt: >> is there any progress regarding this bug AT ALL? I haven't even got an >> acknowledgement for OVER TEN MONTHS! > > You got one from the BTS.
Oh yeah, that's right. But what's new? It's always being acknowledged by the BTS! > I don't reply to any bug with "oh, yes, hmm.". And some not important bugs > just > slip under the radar, too. > >> I don't know why, I cannot imagine you can't reproduce this. I've >> provided a detailed description how to reproduce it, and I would like to >> receive a response, since this bug is still not fixed as of version 2.0.4-5! > > There are many other, more important things.. > >> If I don't get a response on this within a week, I will raise the >> severity to RC to finally get someone to talk to me! It can't be too > > Bullshit. I'd immediately downgrade this and behaviour like that is crap. > It's per definition *not* release-critical. Interesting, so you have the time to do that, but not for a simple message like "This is not important, I'll fix it in 2010?" Anyway, we might as well drop the subject here. You fix it when you have the time -- I didn't know you maintain this package as well, and you might really have more important things to do on other OO-packages, Rene. Regards, André -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFVP1akDGKfHXexj8RAmseAJ9AmivHzjqQ8Rop4+9IUhfsMVx2KwCeKtV8 31wLqqEnLA9eDu9eqSCSwHM= =vMyC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
