On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 04:19:55PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 03:00:40PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > >> I see that nmudiff has magically changed behavior overnight, effectively > >> breaking many of my common use cases. > > Have a look at 2.9.25 please! You're the second person to scream > > about this one, and I've made lots of pseudo-reversions already. > > Thanks. I'll have a look :-) > > > Confused. There was a suggestion in a bug report, and I followed that > > suggestion. I didn't find the time to search the -devel archives to > > see what consensus was reached. > > OK, to summarize (although this was a while ago), here's what I believe are > the three options people presented: > > - Always file a new bug. > - File the bug as a patch if there was one affected bug, or as a new bug if > there were more. > - Stop sending NMU diffs altogether. > > I'd be entirely happy if option #2 became default (and it started sending > attachments again, which it sounds like you've fixed), even though I prefer #1 > for my own use.
OK, I'll go with #2 as default in the next version. Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
