2006/11/9, Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:57:17PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 04:16:55PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> > Package: devscripts
> > Version: 2.9.22
> >
> > When i invoke:
> > $ rmadison -a powerpc lib64gcc1
> > lib64gcc1 | 1:4.1.1-13 | testing | powerpc
> > lib64gcc1 | 1:4.1.1-16 | unstable | powerpc
> > lib64gcc1 | 1:4.2-20060923-1 | experimental | powerpc
> >
> > Right versions are
> > lib64gcc1 | 4.1.1-13 | testing | powerpc
> > lib64gcc1 | 4.1.1-16 | unstable | powerpc
> > lib64gcc1 | 4.2-20060923-1 | experimental | powerpc
>
> No, the first one is correct.
Actually, please could you clarify where you got your epoch-less
version numbers from? Can I guess that you did something like
dpkg -l?
I'm reopening this bug report and reassigning it to dpkg, as dpkg -l
doesn't display epochs, and this is another example of why it should.
There is a patch in the BTS which makes dpkg -l display epochs.
Julian
